More on Respect

I have been criticised on Thinking Anglicans for using the Apartheid analogy to explain why I don’t think simply calling something a “deeply held theological conviction” is enough to exempt it from criticism and make it deserving of respect. Here is why I don’t think it was a cheap shot at the end of a admittedly fairly angry piece.

I think using the Apartheid analogy is entirely justified. You may know the history, but here’s why. Apartheid was a “deeply held theological position” that became the official doctrine of the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa. It was so much a part of the mindset of that church that it was hardly questioned at all by its own members – with the very honourable exception of Beyers Naude. In the end his work and that of the writers of the Kairos document of 1985 and many others forced a thorough going re-examination of the theological grounds of this Internationally much-vilified support for the political programme which it shored up. Eventually that church came to admit they had been wrong and repented of it. But that did not come by their opponents simply “respecting” their deeply held theological opinion – it came because they criticised it steadily, persistently and with great courage in the face of persecution. And thank God they did.

Secondly, I don’t think it is appropriate to introduce the RCs and the Orthodox into the mix. Why? Because they do not do their theology in the way that Anglicans do. Church of England opponents of women in the episcopate need to show us all why their opinions are consonant with the kind of theological reasoning that Anglicans have traditionally deployed.

So I would not want to say the same things to RCs and Orthodox. I might have all sorts of views about the positions that their churches take and their various theological and dogmatic methods, but that would be, as Father Ted would have said, an ecumenical matter. And I would be speaking to them as a fellow Christian, but not as someone who has a material interest in how and why they arrive at the answers they do.

But these people who voted down the measure tell me that they are Anglicans, faithful ones, who want an honoured place in our Church of England. Well, I think they need to justify to the rest of us in terms that we Church of England folk all understand why they have done what they have done. And they and we will do our Church a huge favour if we submit what are the supposed theological rationales for and against to some fairly searching criticism.

A call for respect is seriously misplaced at this juncture – it is saying “peace, peace” when there is no peace.


3 thoughts on “More on Respect

  1. Racism and slavery were deeply held theological beliefs, I a still waiting for someone to ask for an alternative archbishop of York. Deeply held beliefs are usually held in parallel to a rejection of education and willingness to understand, just like the American Christian fundamentalists who home-school their children to avoid them having to hear about evolution.


  2. Why do you call Catholics “Roman Catholics” but not the Orthodox “Eastern Orthodox”? If you consider your own church catholic, does this mean you don’t consider your own church orthodox? Or is this some sort of “Apostolicae Curae” hangup, some lingering pre-raphaellite affectation, like incense and genuflection and crossing yourself and cassocks and calling male clergy “Father”?


    1. No Fred – it is nothing of the sort. I am not that kind of a Church of England person. I think I put the Roman in front because I am distinguishing between those who think they stand in a catholic (small c) tradition of national churches (rather like the Uniate Catholics) and those who follow the Bishop of Rome. Orthodox is a big word, but it applies without distinction to all Eastern Christians. So I defend the usage as reasonably accurate. It doesn’t have any hidden meaning. As you might have spotted my concerns are not really with the niceties of internal church politics, but with their impact on real people’s lives.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s